EPA Method A in the EPA methods list database. View all EPA methods. EPA Method A: Chlorinated Biphenyl. Congeners by HRGC/HRMS. Horizon Technology, Inc., Salem, NH. Horizon Technology, Inc., 45 Northwestern Dr. Ecology may require or allow the use of the most current accepted revision of EPA Method (USEPA, ) at contaminated sites, instead.

Author: Tygobei Akinosar
Country: Anguilla
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 15 April 2015
Pages: 377
PDF File Size: 18.40 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.72 Mb
ISBN: 625-3-99280-271-9
Downloads: 97832
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fenrikinos

Because of the mixing scheme for the tissue matrix it was assumed, if the homogeneity for sample “B” was found acceptable, that the homogeneity of sample “A” would be acceptable.

US EPA METHOD A/B/C “STARTER KIT” – Cambridge Isotope Laboratories –

In this Method, all 12 carbon atoms in the biphenyl molecule are enriched 1686a carbon to produce 13C labeled analogs of the chlorinated biphenyls. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of Method A. This isomeric pair is uniquely resolved from all other congeners and these congeners have the same TEF and response factor.

Multi-lab six labs for water and tissue, four for biosolids data in Table 6 of this Method were provided by laboratories that participated in EPA’s inter- laboratory validation of EPA Method A. Revision A, December Instrument used for this test: Sets of standards solutions will be acquired from suppliers of native and carbon labeled compounds.

Weigh the receiver, record the weight, and return the receiver to the blowdown apparatus, concentrating the residue until a constant weight is obtained. The lipid contents of different species and portions of tissue can vary widely. Draft Method A was subjected to formal peer review in September-October of Many of the EMLs are greater than the equivalent concentrations of the calibration solutions.

These windows may not be adequate for analyte identification See the note in Section Following a review of the background results by SCC, EPA defined the spiking levels, and provided the sample processing laboratory with detailed instructions to divide the unspiked POTW matrix into the required number of aliquots and spike each aliquot separately rather than spiking a bulk volume of wastewater and then subdividing the spiked sample into replicate aliquots to the appropriate concentrations.


Laboratory 6 did not submit tissue data, and reported difficulties with the analysis of this matrix due to interferences from lipids. The lab identities and that of the sample processing laboratory are not revealed in the data or lists in this report. Please contact the webmaster here. Table Summary of Data Received from Participant Laboratories Laboratory 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Total usable data packages Submitted data?

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Allow the column to cool and wet immediately with mL of n-hexane to prevent water from entering. A draft of this report was peer reviewed, and the following changes were made as a result of this review: Results of tissue and biosolids background and homogeneity analyses are discussed in Section 4. Changes outside the scope of Part Place the apparatus in the hot water bath. Repeat the addition of solvent and concentrate once 16688a.

Drain each portion through the sodium sulfate into the concentrator. This test is described in Section 9.

For example, weigh 1 to 2 mg of PCB to three significant figures in a mL ground-glass-stoppered volumetric flask and fill to the mark with nonane. An integrating flow meter is used to collect proportional composite samples. Rinse the sample container twice with 1-mL portions ofhexane and apply separately to the column. Due to budget limitations, EPA intends to seek as much volunteer participation as possible in this study. Trichlorobiphenyls, Total Report List.

On the basis of the available toxicological and physical properties of the CBs, pure standards should be handled only by highly trained personnel thoroughly familiar with handling and cautionary procedures and the associated risks. Concentration for Tissue Figure is a plot of RSD as a function of concentration for the congeners detected in tissue. Because study results were to be used to evaluate or further develop QC acceptance criteria, laboratories were prohibited from performing multiple analyses to improve results.


Rinse the distilling flask with mL of methylene chloride and pour through the drying column. Immediately after sample shipment i. Also termed “coefficient of variation. Low recoveries at LOCs 16668a and 2 Table may be due to loss during transport from the sample preparation laboratory to the participant laboratories.

No archived sample volume was available for wastewater, therefore, the sample processing laboratory prepared the wastewater samples. Concentrate the small 16668a to constant weight per Section Following calibration, flush the injection system with solvent to ensure that residual CBs are removed from the system.

A new footnote 1 to Table 6 references the EPA interlaboratory study report, and the other footnote numbers are incremented. Slowly apply vacuum to the system, and begin rotating the sample flask.

Record the weight to the nearest 10 mg. In the case of the second biosolids sample, an emulsion resulted 168a back-extraction with base Section Grind the sample aliquots from Sections Retention time RT reference used to locate target congener. Drain the water from the Dean-Stark receiver and add any toluene in the receiver to the extract in the flask. If glassware is first rinsed with solvent, the wash water may be disposed of in the sewer.